Skip to content
STEELTOETOOLS
OSHA Compliance · 8 min read

PPE Hazard Assessment Requirements Under 1910.132(d)

By — Editorial team of SteelToeTools.com (published by LSEA SAS) Updated

In general industry, 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2) requires the employer to verify that a workplace hazard assessment was done, through a written record identifying four things: the workplace evaluated, the person attesting to the evaluation, the date or dates, and the document itself. That is the whole documentary obligation - and it is narrower, and applies to fewer types of PPE, than most safety manuals assume.

What 1910.132(d) covers - and what it does not

Start with the carve-out, because it is the single most misapplied paragraph in Subpart I. 1910.132(g) reads: "Paragraphs (d) and (f) of this section apply only to §§ 1910.133, 1910.135, 1910.136, 1910.138, and 1910.140. Paragraphs (d) and (f) of this section do not apply to §§ 1910.134 and 1910.137."

Which PPE the 1910.132(d) assessment and (f) training reach
EquipmentStandardCovered by (d) and (f)?
Eye and face protection1910.133Yes
Head protection1910.135Yes
Foot protection1910.136Yes
Hand protection1910.138Yes
Personal fall protection1910.140Yes
Respiratory protection1910.134No - own written program, medical evaluation, fit testing
Electrical protective equipment1910.137No - own requirements
Hearing protection1910.95Not under 132(d) - governed by the noise standard
A written PPE hazard assessment that lists "respirator: half-face APR" as its conclusion is not wrong to mention it, but it does not discharge anything under 1910.134. Respirators need a written respiratory protection program, a medical evaluation and a fit test before anyone wears one. The same goes for hearing protectors, where the evaluation method is set by 1910.95 Appendix B - see our guide to NRR derating.

Everything else about PPE still flows from 1910.132(a), which is broad: protective equipment "shall be provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants."

The four items the written record must identify

Paragraph (d)(2) is one sentence. The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written record that identifies:

  • The workplace evaluated. Name the actual area or operation - "Bay 3, weld cells 1-4," not "Manufacturing."
  • The person attesting that the evaluation has been performed. A name, not a department.
  • The date or dates of the hazard assessment. Plural in the text, because a walk-through can span several visits.
  • An identification of the document as a hazard assessment record. A title on the page. This is the item people leave off, and it is the easiest one to fix.
Note what is not on the list: the hazards found, the PPE chosen, the body parts, employee signatures. Those are what make the document useful - and what an inspector will read first - but the four items above are the ones the standard names. Put all of it on one page and the argument never comes up. The PPE hazard assessment form carries the four required items plus the hazards and PPE by body part.

How to run the assessment: the Appendix B method

1910.132(d)(1) tells you to assess the workplace but not how. The note under it points to Appendix B to Subpart I, which is non-mandatory but is the method OSHA itself describes as complying. Its four steps are survey, sources, organize, analyze.

Appendix B opens with a warning worth keeping in front of a client who wants to solve everything with gloves: "PPE devices alone should not be relied on to provide protection against hazards, but should be used in conjunction with guards, engineering controls, and sound manufacturing practices."

The seven basic hazard categories

During the walk-through survey, Appendix B says consideration should be given to: impact, penetration, compression (roll-over), chemical, heat, harmful dust, and light (optical) radiation. Seven, no more - it is a short enough list to hold in your head while walking.

The ten sources to look for

Appendix B, paragraph 3.b - what to observe during the walk-through
#Source to observe
aSources of motion - moving tools, machine elements, particles, or people colliding with stationary objects
bSources of high temperatures - burns, eye injury, ignition of protective equipment
cTypes of chemical exposures
dSources of harmful dust
eSources of light radiation - welding, brazing, cutting, furnaces, heat treating, high intensity lights
fSources of falling objects, or potential for dropping objects
gSources of sharp objects that might pierce the feet or cut the hands
hSources of rolling or pinching objects that could crush the feet
iLayout of the workplace and location of co-workers
jAny electrical hazards

Appendix B adds one more input that costs nothing and is usually skipped: "injury/accident data should be reviewed to help identify problem areas." Then organize the data, and analyze it - for each basic hazard, determine "the type, level of risk, and seriousness of potential injury," and consider "the possibility of exposure to several hazards simultaneously."

Selection, fit and training

Once hazards are identified, (d)(1) imposes three duties in sequence: select and have each affected employee use PPE that protects against the hazards identified, communicate the selection decisions to each affected employee, and select PPE that properly fits each affected employee.

Appendix B's selection guidance goes a step further than "greater than zero": select equipment "which ensures a level of protection greater than the minimum required to protect employees from the hazards," then fit the user and give instructions on care and use, making sure end users know all warning labels and limitations. On fit it is blunt - "PPE that fits poorly will not afford the necessary protection" - and it flags eye protection sealing to the face and helmets staying on the head, with the practical note that a chin strap "should break at a reasonably low force" to prevent a strangulation hazard.

Training under 1910.132(f)(1) has five required subjects: when PPE is necessary, what PPE is necessary, how to properly don, doff, adjust and wear it, its limitations, and its proper care, maintenance, useful life and disposal. Two clauses people miss:

  • (f)(2) requires a demonstration. Each employee must demonstrate understanding and the ability to use the PPE properly before being allowed to perform work requiring it. A signed roster is not a demonstration.
  • (f)(3) requires retraining when workplace changes or PPE changes make previous training obsolete, or when an employee's knowledge or use of assigned PPE shows they have not retained the skill.

Construction plays by different rules

On a construction site, 1910.132 does not apply. The obligations come from 1926.28(a) - "The employer is responsible for requiring the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions" - and from Subpart E, principally 1926.95.

General industry vs construction, PPE obligations compared
ObligationGeneral industry (1910)Construction (1926)
Assess the workplace for PPE needsRequired, 1910.132(d)(1)No equivalent clause; the duty is implicit in 1926.28(a)
Written record of the assessmentRequired, 1910.132(d)(2)Not required
PPE must properly fit each employeeRequired, 1910.132(d)(1)(iii)Required, 1926.95(c)(2) - added December 12, 2024, effective January 13, 2025
Five-subject PPE trainingRequired, 1910.132(f)No general clause; specific standards impose their own (for example 1926.503 for fall protection)
Employer pays, with exceptions1910.132(h)1926.95(d) - same structure and same exceptions

The fit rule is the recent change worth flagging to any GC still working from an old manual. Until January 13, 2025, construction's PPE standard had no explicit fit requirement while general industry and shipyards did; OSHA's final rule closed that gap by adding 1926.95(c)(2), which requires PPE to be "selected to ensure that it properly fits each affected employee." The practical target of the rule is well documented in the rulemaking record: equipment sized for an average male body that leaves smaller workers - and larger ones - in ill-fitting harnesses, gloves and high-visibility clothing.

No written assessment clause in 1926 does not mean no paperwork is useful. A one-page written assessment per work area is the cheapest way to show a GC, a client or an inspector that PPE selection was reasoned rather than habitual - and many prime contracts require it regardless of what OSHA says.

Who pays for PPE

The default is unambiguous: PPE used to comply with Part 1910 (or Part 1926) "shall be provided by the employer at no cost to employees." The exceptions are a closed list, and the same in both parts:

  • Non-specialty safety-toe footwear and non-specialty prescription safety eyewear - only if the employer permits those items to be worn off the jobsite.
  • Metatarsal shoes or boots - where the employer provides metatarsal guards and the employee, at their own request, chooses boots with built-in protection instead.
  • Everyday clothing - long-sleeve shirts, long pants, street shoes, normal work boots.
  • Ordinary weather gear - winter coats, jackets, gloves, parkas, rubber boots, hats, raincoats, ordinary sunglasses, sunscreen, skin creams, used solely for protection from weather.
  • Replacements are on the employer - "except when the employee has lost or intentionally damaged the PPE."

Two further points. An employee may use adequate PPE they own, and the employer need not reimburse it - but the employer "shall not require an employee to provide or pay for his or her own PPE" outside the listed exceptions. And where another OSHA standard has its own payment provision, that standard's provision prevails.

Five ways the assessment goes wrong

  • One document for the whole facility. (d)(2) requires the workplace evaluated to be identified. A site-wide sheet identifies nothing.
  • PPE listed by job title instead of by hazard. "Welders: shade 10" is a conclusion without an assessment. The record should show the hazard that drove the choice.
  • Assuming PPE is the control. Appendix B puts guards and engineering controls first. An assessment that never asks whether the hazard could be removed is skipping the cheaper answer.
  • Treating respirators and hearing protectors as covered. 1910.132(g) excludes 1910.134; 1910.95 governs hearing protection. Both need their own programs.
  • Ordering by the case, in one size. Fit is a requirement in both parts now. Stocking one glove size and one harness size is a citable condition, not a purchasing preference.

Bottom line

  • General industry: assess the workplace, then keep a written record naming the workplace, the person, the date and the document. Four items.
  • Use the Appendix B method - walk-through, seven hazard categories, ten sources, plus your injury records - and write down what you found, not just what you bought.
  • 1910.132(d) and (f) do not reach respirators, electrical protective equipment or hearing protection. Those live in 1910.134, 1910.137 and 1910.95.
  • Construction has no written-assessment clause, but since January 13, 2025 it does have an explicit fit requirement at 1926.95(c)(2).
  • The employer pays, minus a short closed list of exceptions - and pays for replacements unless the employee lost or wrecked the item on purpose.

Frequently asked questions

In general industry, yes. 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2) requires the employer to verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written record that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person attesting that the evaluation was performed, the date or dates of the assessment, and that identifies the document for what it is. Construction has no equivalent written clause.

Four items, and only four: the workplace evaluated, the person who performed or verified the evaluation, the date or dates of the hazard assessment, and an identification of the document itself. Everything else - the hazards found, the PPE selected by body part, the sign-offs - is good practice that inspectors expect to see, not a listed element.

No. 1910.132(g) states that paragraphs (d) and (f) apply only to 1910.133 (eye and face), 1910.135 (head), 1910.136 (foot), 1910.138 (hand) and 1910.140 (personal fall protection), and that they do not apply to 1910.134 (respiratory protection) or 1910.137 (electrical protective equipment). Respirators need their own written program, medical evaluation and fit testing under 1910.134. Hearing protection is governed by 1910.95.

The standard sets no interval. Appendix B, paragraph 7, puts reassessment on the safety officer whenever it is necessary - new equipment and processes, a review of accident records, or reevaluating whether previously selected PPE is still suitable. In practice: reassess when the work, the chemicals, the equipment or the layout change, and record the date.

Yes, in both general industry and construction. 1910.132(d)(1)(iii) has long required the employer to select PPE that properly fits each affected employee. OSHA added the same requirement to construction at 1926.95(c)(2) in a final rule published December 12, 2024 (89 FR 100346), effective January 13, 2025.

The employer, at no cost to employees, with listed exceptions - 1910.132(h)(1) in general industry and 1926.95(d)(1) in construction. The main exceptions are non-specialty safety-toe footwear and non-specialty prescription safety eyewear where the employer allows them to be worn off site, everyday clothing, and ordinary weather gear. The employer must pay for replacement PPE unless the employee lost or intentionally damaged it.

Only if it ends up naming your workplace, your hazards and your date. The written record required by (d)(2) is specific to the workplace evaluated. A blank matrix of trades and glove types documents nothing about the area an inspector is standing in.

No. A JHA breaks a task into steps and assigns controls to each one; the PPE hazard assessment evaluates an area or operation to decide what PPE is necessary and records that the evaluation happened. They complement each other, and neither one satisfies the other's requirement.

Sources & references

Content checked against these sources — last reviewed August 28, 2026.

Editorial team of SteelToeTools.com (published by LSEA SAS)

Tools and guides researched against primary sources (OSHA, NIOSH, ACI, ASME, NFPA) and reviewed before publication.

Informational content, not legal, engineering or safety advice. Verify requirements with the standards cited and a qualified professional. See our editorial policy.

Keep reading