Respirator APF & Maximum Use Concentration (MUC) Calculator
Pick a respirator and this calculator returns its assigned protection factor from the 29 CFR 1910.134 Table 1 list, then multiplies that APF by the exposure limit to give the maximum use concentration. Enter a measured airborne concentration and it also shows the minimum APF the job needs and whether the respirator you picked covers it.
Results are estimates for planning purposes and do not replace a competent person's evaluation or an engineer's design. Follow the OSHA standards that apply to your work and your employer's written program.
Table 1 — Assigned Protection Factors (29 CFR 1910.134)
| Type of respirator | Quarter mask | Half mask | Full facepiece | Helmet / hood | Loose-fitting facepiece |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Air-purifying respirator | 5 | 10 3 | 50 | — | — |
| 2. Powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) | — | 50 | 1,000 | 25 / 1,000 4 | 25 |
| 3. Supplied-air (SAR) or airline respirator — demand mode | — | 10 | 50 | — | — |
| 3. SAR — continuous flow mode | — | 50 | 1,000 | 25 / 1,000 4 | 25 |
| 3. SAR — pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode | — | 50 | 1,000 | — | — |
| 4. Self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) — demand mode | — | 10 | 50 | 50 | — |
| 4. SCBA — pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode | — | — | 10,000 | 10,000 | — |
- Employers may select respirators assigned for use in higher workplace concentrations of a hazardous substance for use at lower concentrations of that substance, or when required respirator use is independent of concentration.
- The assigned protection factors are only effective when the employer implements a continuing, effective respirator program as required by 29 CFR 1910.134, including training, fit testing, maintenance and use requirements.
- This APF category includes filtering facepieces, and half masks with elastomeric facepieces.
- The employer must have evidence provided by the respirator manufacturer that testing of these respirators demonstrates performance at a level of protection of 1,000 or greater to receive an APF of 1,000. Absent such testing, all other PAPRs and SARs with helmets or hoods are treated as loose-fitting facepiece respirators and receive an APF of 25.
- These APFs do not apply to respirators used solely for escape.
Where the MUC stops applying
Three limits sit on top of the arithmetic on this page, and all three come from 1910.134(d)(3)(i)(B):
- IDLH atmospheres. Employers must not apply MUCs to conditions that are immediately dangerous to life or health. Those conditions require the respirators listed in 1910.134(d)(2) — a full-facepiece pressure-demand SCBA, or a combination full-facepiece pressure-demand supplied-air respirator with an auxiliary self-contained air supply.
- The IDLH level and the cartridge. When the calculated MUC exceeds the IDLH level for the substance, or the performance limits of the cartridge or canister, the maximum MUC is set at that lower limit.
- Oxygen-deficient air. No air-purifying respirator is acceptable, at any APF, in an atmosphere that does not have enough oxygen. That is a supplied-air question.
Air-purifying respirators used against gases and vapors carry a further condition under 1910.134(d)(3)(iii): an end-of-service-life indicator certified by NIOSH for the contaminant, or a documented cartridge change schedule based on objective information or data.
The APF assumes a real respiratory protection program
Footnote 2 to Table 1 is the one that gets skipped: the assigned protection factors hold only where the employer runs a continuing, effective respirator program — written procedures, medical evaluation before use, fit testing for every tight-fitting facepiece, cartridge change schedules, cleaning, storage and training. A worker in a half mask that has never been fit tested is not covered by an APF of 10; the number describes a program, not a piece of rubber. Facial hair along the sealing surface breaks the seal, and no APF in Table 1 survives that.
How it's calculated
- Maximum use concentration (MUC)
MUC = APF x exposure limit (PEL, STEL or ceiling limit)The definition in 1910.134(b): the MUC is determined by multiplying the assigned protection factor specified for a respirator by the required OSHA permissible exposure limit, short-term exposure limit, or ceiling limit. The MUC comes out in the same unit as the limit you entered.- Hazard ratio
hazard ratio = measured concentration outside the respirator / exposure limitHow many times over the limit the air is. This ratio is the minimum protection the respirator has to deliver.- Minimum assigned protection factor needed
minimum APF = hazard ratio, rounded up to the next APF published in Table 1 (5, 10, 25, 50, 1,000, 10,000)1910.134(d)(3)(i)(A): employers must use the assigned protection factors listed in Table 1 to select a respirator that meets or exceeds the required level of employee protection.- Adequacy check
the selection works when measured concentration <= MUC1910.134(d)(3)(i)(B)(1): the employer must select a respirator that maintains the employee's exposure to the hazardous substance, when measured outside the respirator, at or below the MUC.- Two limits that cap the MUC
MUC used = the lower of (APF x limit), the IDLH level, and the cartridge or canister performance limit1910.134(d)(3)(i)(B)(3). And under (B)(2), MUCs are never applied to conditions that are immediately dangerous to life or health: those call for the respirators listed in 1910.134(d)(2).
Frequently asked questions
Sources & references
- 29 CFR 1910.134 — Respiratory protection: Table 1 Assigned Protection Factors, MUC definition in (b), selection in (d)(3)(i)
- 29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(1) — Respirable crystalline silica PEL, 50 µg/m³ as an 8-hour TWA (construction)
- 29 CFR 1910.1053(c) — Respirable crystalline silica PEL, 50 µg/m³ as an 8-hour TWA (general industry)
- 29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1) — Lead PEL, 50 µg/m³ over an 8-hour period
- 29 CFR 1910.1026(c) — Chromium (VI) PEL, 5 µg/m³ as an 8-hour TWA
- 29 CFR 1910.1027(c) — Cadmium PEL, 5 µg/m³ as an 8-hour TWA
- 29 CFR 1910.1001(c)(1) — Asbestos PEL, 0.1 fiber per cubic centimeter as an 8-hour TWA
Content checked against these sources — last reviewed August 28, 2026.